Mailing List Message #106596
From: <>
Subject: Re: PolluStop
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:42:45 +0200
To: <>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v6.1.9
i use PolluStop since long time, Very good product, very easy to setup and Nicolas is very professional.
I recommend it.


From: Jeff Wark <>
Subject: Re: PolluStop
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:28:18 -0230
To: CommuniGate Pro Discussions <>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v6.1.11
Message Header

Undecoded Message
We moved from Cloudmark to PolluStop a few years ago.  One of the biggest differences was Cloudmark was a 'set it and forget it' configuration.  No training or anything. PolluStop, on the other hand, did require configuration and training.

I often think that the good thing about Cloudmark was that you didn't have to train it, and the bad thing was that you couldn't train it.  PolluStop, the good thing was that you could train it, and the bad thing was you had to train it.

PolluStop definitely has more options for configuration and it has served us very well.  Nicolas' attention to his customers is also a plus.  Any problems we have had, he has addressed them quickly, sometimes releasing new code to fix a bug.

I recommend it.

Jeff Wark
Tbaytel Internet
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 16:36:39 +1000
"Shaun Gamble" <> wrote:
Has anyone moved from CGPSA (or other spam filters) to Pollustop?

I know Niversoft products work really well, I just want to see how affective PolluStop is. I am concerned SpamAssassin's last stable release was 2015. It still works but not as well as I would like it to.

-- Shaun
Fitzroy Island <>
Destination Darwin NT <>
MOM Backpackers <>
Value Inn Hotel <>
Please do not send any unsolicited email. It is not wanted.
Messagerie Sécurisée CentralPost®
essai sur demande
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster