Mailing List SIMS@mail.stalker.com Message #6502
From: Technical Support, Stalker Labs <support@stalker.com>
Subject: Re: Really big logs
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:08:03 +0400
To: SIMS Discussions <SIMS@mail.stalker.com>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate 3.2.2b
Hello,

There's no point in keeping HTTP log level below Failures unless you are trying to resolve some problem.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2000, 00:01:35 GMT
  Kreme, <kreme@kreme.com> wrote:

>In looking over my logs toady trying to figure out why my server crashed
>for the second time in two days, I can across several thousand lines of this:
>
>17:32:07 4 HTTP-016([x.x.x.x]) Sending 83 LOG bytes
>17:32:07 4 HTTP-016([x.x.x.x]) Sending 83 LOG bytes
>17:32:07 4 HTTP-016([x.x.x.x]) Sending 83 LOG bytes
>17:32:07 4 HTTP-016([x.x.x.x]) Sending 83 LOG bytes
>17:32:07 4 HTTP-016([x.x.x.x]) Sending 83 LOG bytes
>17:32:07 4 HTTP-016([x.x.x.x]) Sending 83 LOG bytes
>17:32:07 4 HTTP-016([x.x.x.x]) Sending 83 LOG bytes
>
>The IP is the IP of my work Windows machine and the time matches up with
>when I was checking mail.
>
>My logs were set to all info, but still thousands of lines?  There appear
>to be 16 lines per second for 16 minutes.  I have no idea if that is a
>coincidence or not.  I haven't been able to do a `wc -l` yet, but I suspect
>the # of lines will exceed 15,000.
>
>17:31:26 to 17:47:50

Best regards,
Dmitry Akindinov

=======================================================================
When answering to letters sent to you by the tech.support staff, make
sure the original message you have received is included into your reply.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster